There's good news for home buyers as the Bombay High Court on Wednesday upheld the constitutional validity of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) act, 2016 (RERA) and the authority formed under it.
A division bench of Justices Naresh Patil and Rajesh Ketkar rejected multiple petitions filed by builders and devlopers that challenged the validity of some of the sections of the Act. "To wipe out tears from every eye".
The RERA Act aims at protecting the interest of consumers in the real estate sector by establishing an adjudicating mechanism for speedy redressal of disputes. It also said that the authority should not cancel projects or developers' registration in cases where the delay was caused due to "exceptional and compelling circumstances".
The high court bench said, "Such powers shall be exercised on a case-to-case basis". The court's orders have come as a setback to the developer community, since the RERA is tasked with the business of regulating the incomplete projects. "The problems are enormous and it's time to take a step forward to fulfill the dream of the Father of the Nation - To wipe out tears from every eye".
The court also struck down a provision that provided for appointment of bureaucrats as members of an appellate tribunal.
Blackwater Founder Denies Trump Connection to Seychelles Meeting
But Prince said he could not remember whether the conversation with Bannon took place before or after his trip to the Seychelles. Prince said he never told Bannon about meeting Dmitriev, and could not recall if he ever told Bannon about his meeting with MBZ.
As per the Act, developers, projects and agents had time till July 31 to compulsorily register their projects with the Authority. DB Realty group of companies, had challenged as illegal, a provision which bars-except in case of a force majeure or a natural disaster-any extension beyond a year for completion of project, if it is not completed within the deadline mentioned by the builder while registration. In the constitution of a tribunal, majority members must be judges or judicial officers, the court added. However, Dhanuka said the court's view that only officials with judicial background should head the appellate tribunal makes lot of sense as it is expected to bring in transparency to the functioning.
The Centre and the State government had vehemently defended the Act, and justified the strict provisions by arguing the same were meant to protect buyers, and to rein in rogue developers.
While the bench concurred with the state and the Union government's arguments, it said that the authorities must also closely monitor the implementation of the Act.
Builders had filed cases in the High Courts of Bombay, Nagpur, Aurangabad, Bangalore challenging provisions of RERA including the provision of ongoing projects. Other courts should wait for the Bombay HC's decision before hearing RERA-related matters, it said, while directing the Bombay HC to expedite hearings.
- 'Not out of the woods' with hand injury
- Washington Real Estate Investment (WRE): Zooming in on the Technicals
- Jeffrey Tambor May Not Be Quitting "Transparent" After All
- Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP) Shares Cross Below 200 DMA
- Tax protesters at Collins' Office Charged With Trespassing
- Moore police release videos of confrontation with senator at hotel
- Analyst Commentary On BCE Inc. (BCE), Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL)
- Gas station hopes blue lights in bathroom can deter drug use
- NextEra Energy Inc (NEE) Position Decreased by First Midwest Bank Trust Division
- John Green reteaming with Fox for Turtles All the Way Down movie