The companies filed a brief in the case Carpenter v. The industry titans signed the 44-page brief filed in court on Monday night. Carpenter later appealed his case, but an appellate court ruled that the Fourth Amendment - which protects USA citizens from unreasonable search and seizure - doesn't apply to this kind of user data and that no warrant is required for police to obtain it.
Carpenter's case will be argued before the court some time after its new term begins in October. Authorities investigating robberies in and around Detroit obtained several months of cellphone location data without a warrant, including roughly 13,000 locations associated with the plaintiff.
Notwithstanding that technology companies may use or share the data to increase revenue, they are justifiably concerned that lack of a Fourth Amendment barrier will make people think twice about using digital services that create revenue-generating data. For suspect Timothy Carpenter, the records covered 127 days and revealed 12,898 separate points of location data, an average of over 100 location points per day.
Kenya protest: Violence follows re-election of President Uhuru Kenyatta
Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said Tuesday that the government has the responsibility to ensure that security forces exercise restraint. Kenya police claim that 10 people have been killed and said almost all were committing crimes.
Tech companies aren't the only ones supporting the ACLU in this case.
This is an important case when it comes to the extent of our privacy rights in the digital age.
The Knight First Amendment Institute wrote on behalf of 19 technology experts to highlight the increasing precision of cell phone location data and the highly sensitive information about people's lives that the data can reveal. The so-called third-party doctrine and the content/noncontent distinction, they said, should not categorically foreclose Fourth Amendment protection. Carpenter is represented at the Supreme Court by attorneys for the ACLU and ACLU of MI; defense attorney Harold Gurewitz of Gurewitz & Raben, PLC; and Jeffrey Fisher, co-director of the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. "In particular, the tech firms are sending a very clear message that the law needs to catch up with the technology that is now an integral part of our everyday lives".
- United Kingdom house price growth eases for third month in row
- Six new cases of West Nile Virus reported in Mississippi
- Stifel Nicolaus Downgrades Rating On Dick's Sporting Goods Inc (DKS)
- Captain Marvel Movie Enlists New Screenwriter
- Hovnanian Enterprises Inc Sentiment Improves on Better Stock Potential
- Aaron Carter Makes Emotional Performance at Gay Bar in Tampa
- Rail commuters brace for biggest increase in fares in five years
- Does Short Sleep Mean Higher T2D Risk for Kids?
- Tillerson condemns ISIS 'genocide' of religious minorities
- MoviePass drops monthly price of unlimited movies to just $10