On Thursday night, the U.S. Justice Department formally asked the Supreme Court to allow the order to be implemented - it would cover travel and refugee admissions from six majority-Muslim countries, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. "Until he determines they are properly vetted, that's pretty consistent with what we talked about".
Another appeals court on the West Coast is yet to rule on a similar appeal after Trump's second "Muslim travel ban" order was blocked indefinitely by a federal judge in the state of Hawaii at the end of March.
Information from Reuters was used in this report.
President Donald Trump is looking to the highest court in the land to approve his controversial executive order that temporarily bans travel from six Muslim-majority nations after a series of defeats in lower courts. The Department of Justice (DoJ) filed two emergency applications with the Court seeking to reverse two lower court rulings that halted President Trump's executive order. Yesterday the government urged the Supreme Court to review the 4th Circuit's ruling on the merits and to freeze the district court's order barring the implementation of the travel ban.
The administration also filed a separate appeal in that case.
That ruling was upheld last month in a ruling by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia which stated in its ruing that the order was racist. They say the Constitution makes clear that federal executives control immigration, while immigration laws say the president may "suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens" if he thinks they "would be detrimental to the interests of the USA".
Écrasante majorité en vue pour Macron — Législatives françaises
En Guadeloupe, en Guyane, à Saint-Martin et Saint-Barthélémy, les candidats REM se sont qualifiés pour le second tour. En revanche, il peut espérer battre le record de sièges pour un seul parti, détenu par l'UMP en 2002 (365 sièges).
Trump is asking the court to hear arguments on an expedited basis and to reinstate the executive order in the interim.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in the administration's request for a stay pending appeal to lift the Hawaii injunction on May 15, but it has not yet ruled.
Three dissenting judges pointed to a 1972 Supreme Court decision that said courts shouldn't second-guess immigration decisions that are based on a "facially legitimate and bona fide reason". The appeals court's May 25 opinion also faulted the White House for rushing out the first version without consulting with the national security agencies.
The ban needs the backing of at least of five of the nine presiding Supreme Court justices to become law.
The administration says the US will be safer with this policy put in place.
The Supreme Court may well refuse to take this case, "because it's a time-limited order", said Anil Kalhan, law professor at Dexel University Kline School of Law. But the weirdness of the request - which is almost certainly an attempt to speed up the process before the Supreme Court adjourns for the summer - may not sit well with the procedure-minded justices. That ruling could come within two weeks.
According to its lawyers, a ban on enforcement should apply only to a one of the challengers in the Maryland case, a man who seems to bring his Iranian wife to the United States.
- Sky sources: Downing Street made statement on DUP deal in error
- Les résultats du 1er tour des élections législatives 2017 annoncés
- 'Positive talks' between Conservatives and DUP over power deal
- Législatives en France: la déception des adversaires de la République en Marche
- Rawhide dog chews recalled due to possible chemical contamination
- Macron rafle la mise — Législatives françaises
- Macron en passe d'obtenir une large majorité à l'Assemblée nationale — France-Législatives
- Tata Comm links up with Alibaba Cloud
- (E3) Forza Motorsport 7 pour le 3 octobre
- "Pittsburgh" for the second time in a row won the Stanley Cup