Mercredi, 27 Mai 2020
Dernières nouvelles
Principale » McKinley Explains Vote for American Health Care Act

McKinley Explains Vote for American Health Care Act

15 Mai 2017

Republican representatives ignored that plea, just as they ignored the warnings from nearly every American medical organization, a number of whom joined in this statement: "Our organizations, which represent over 560,000 physicians and medical students, are deeply disappointed that the U.S. House of Representatives today passed the American Health Care Act, an inherently flawed bill that would do great harm to our patients". But remember Trump's previous pledges: "Insurance for everybody" or "no one will lose coverage" and "no cuts to Medicaid". If ever there was a windfall deserving of the name "blood money", this is it. It cuts Medicaid so deeply - by $880 billion over 10 years - that some believe it could be a fatal blow. By allowing states to decide whether or not they'd waive protections, women will once again face discrimination based on their gender.

The CBO does not actually give a figure for the average premium - which would not be very helpful anyway, because premiums depend so much on age, geographic location and other factors.

Even as American political culture helps to explain the health care debate in America, culture is far from the only reason America lacks universal coverage. Sure. Ditto with medical care costs.

But we do know what Obamacare has produced - broken promises, disappointment, government overreach and dysfunctional health insurance markets around the country. Medicaid and Medicare were established to close the gap.

Hogan doesn't need to bury Trump or members of the GOP Congress to make his point on the House Republicans' health care proposal. One of Obamacare's clauses meant that insurers had to provide insurance for people with "pre-existing conditions" - that is, those who were already ill before applying.

Trump is reportedly considering a massive White House shakeup
Incoming administration officials raised alarm in the media by suggesting that it would change seating assignments for briefings. Comey until the last possible moment because he feared that the communications staff would leak the news.

The show hit the streets in January to ask people a simple question: if they preferred Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act. Through no fault of their own, millions can't earn enough. Don't expect Paul Ryan to mention this anytime soon, but the ACA had some success there, too. To them and other AHCA supporters, the dollar is more sacred than the doctor. Years of calculated fearmongering, misrepresentations and lies culminated in the GOP-led House narrowly voting to repeal the ACA, with a so-called replacement. As policy experts have pointed out in studies of the US health system, the country doesn't "have a comprehensive national health insurance system because American political institutions are structurally biased against this kind of comprehensive reform".

"You can't get what you want all the time", Blum told the group in Marshalltown. By reforming Medicaid financing we are empowering states to meet the unique needs of their residents. Moreover, only a third of USA counties have an Obamacare provider, and public support for the policy has understandably remained low. In states like Iowa, Texas, Idaho, Kansas, Nevada, Indiana, Michigan and OH (to name a few), whose median household income is lower than $50,000-not to mention Arkansas, West Virginia, and MS, whose median income is below $40,000-that's a lot of affected voters. As long as a state signed up for Medicaid expansion before 2020, the AHCA does nothing to change its levels of funding. People living with a host of medical conditions are anxious about the future of their coverage if the Republican plan becomes law.

Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia was also talking health care Friday morning. Such as the assumption that healthy young people, many of whom are baristas still residing in their parents' basement, would miraculously bankroll the costs of the sick and elderly. In total, if all the federal money was used for high-risk pools, it would work out to $13.8 billion annually.

A common ground, bipartisan solution to health care?